On a brisk day in November 1998, a doughy balding Brooklyn computer salesman was supposed to report to prison to begin serving a 17-year sentence. He rented a Ford Taurus. Drove to Queens to turn in the ankle monitor he had been wearing. He took $600 out of an ATM. Headed to JFK airport. And vanished. His name was John Ruffo. The crime he had committed was outlandish. Using forged documents and fake corporate seals, he persuaded banks to loan him $350 million. He invented a nonexistent proposition that he called “Project Star” and he used the money to gamble the millions on the stock market, becoming one of Wall Street’s high-rollers. When the FBI caught wind of his swindle, they set up a sting. At his sentencing, prosecutors made an unthinkable mistake. They agreed to let John Ruffo drive himself to prison. What followed was one of the longest and most challenging manhunts in the history of the U.S. Marshals Service. We discover a man whose life was a hall of mirrors. Secret identities, unlikely affiliations, and bogus companies are uncovered. Was he secretly helping an elite unit of FBI spy-hunters lure Soviet scientists to defect? Did he cut a deal with the mob to help him disappear? Was that him, seated behind home plate at Dodger Stadium? We join the chase as the Marshals try and resolve a case that has baffled and bewildered generations of their colleagues, crossing the globe to ask one pressing question: Have you seen this man?
1. 作为科幻片但没有任何新意，讲克隆技术的电影已经有很多了。旧瓶装的也是旧酒，对家人的无条件的爱早已是陈词滥调，因而所有人物形象都扁平而无活力，演员很费劲。2. 正如不知所谓的湖山风光，如此一个和社会伦理联系紧密的主题，为什么会被隔绝在社会之外讨论。3. 科幻电影的社会价值之一是对科技理性的批判，然而这部电影的黑科技完美无缺零bug零差评，完全没有任何对技术理性的警惕。4. 也许是因为启用了月光男孩的演员，电影似乎想模仿一种文艺风格，大量特写和长镜头却让人尴尬。5. 记忆也许是个可以深挖的点，但却简单粗暴地描述为数据复制。记忆怎么可能被数字化呢
喜欢这种调调，缓缓叙事，娓娓道来，表面溪流入场，里面暗潮涌动，纠结与挣扎之后，唯有爱，让一切和解，技术的价值判断在善与恶之间，最终的解决方案，还是爱，虽然主旨俗套，但表演不俗，拍摄不俗，音乐不俗，观感自然不俗。
随风升华
过去的一切
大型苹果广告。风景不错，未来感十足，演员演技在线，对克隆人的反思很深刻。可是——就是TMD不好看！
看哭了😭用对自己的残忍去置换对家人的幸福，得绝症本就很凄惨！还要孤独的死去！
演技一流，没有什么抓马的剧情，最后带来的妻子的告白也太感人了。
虽然科幻得很玄幻，但是平实的叙述，精湛的演技，冲淡了基本上不可能的科技成就，很感人。
不如鼓勵妻兒更獨立壹些……
如果有一天我也要这样离去，我可能也会如此选择
不以故事和场景迷人，只有细致入微的感情~适合心平气和时慢慢的品味
尽管不是很喜欢主人公的性格，天鹅们还是天鹅
有种黑镜的既视感，但却没有黑色讽刺那种味，而是另外不知所谓的味道。
从技术层面保持怀疑，但从哲学角度，今天的我已经不是昨天的我，明天的我也不是今天的我，那么复制一个完全一样的我，到底是不是我已经没有答案。我觉得这并不是憧憬科技，而是回归人类本身，探讨爱与死亡。影片的落点很温情，译名很贴切，高概念的主题依然饱含人文情愫，这很苹果。另外以后的 Apple Car 会不会就是他们坐的车！
拿到的片源不好，有卡顿，有模糊，有少了的字幕翻译。故事可以呀～就是如果这样的事发生在自己身边，能接受这样的选择吗？
大智度论中有典故如此“如有一人，受使远行，独宿空舍。夜中有鬼担一死人来着其前，复有一鬼逐来，瞋骂前鬼：“是死人是我物，汝何以担来？”先鬼言：“是我物，我自持来。”后鬼言：“是死人实我担来！”二鬼各捉一手争之。前鬼言：“此有人可问。”后鬼即问：“是死人谁担来？”是人思惟：“此二鬼力大，若实语亦当死，若妄语亦当死，俱不免死，何为妄语？”语言：“前鬼担来。”后鬼大瞋，捉人手拔出着地，前鬼取死人一臂拊之即着。如是两臂、两脚、头、胁，举身皆易。于是二鬼共食所易人身，拭口而去。其人思惟：“我人母生身，眼见二鬼食尽，今我此身尽是他肉。我今定有身耶？为无身耶？若以为有，尽是他身；若以为无，今现有身。”如是思惟，其心迷闷，譬如狂人”
阳光温暖我的脸庞
视频解说看完，确实很不错的故事，娓娓道来却意义深远，默默孤独地等待死亡接受被最爱的人遗忘，还需要多大的勇气啊！
1.分巧克力那段影史最美邂逅之一 2.复制得了记忆却治不了癫痫这谁敢信 3.我爱你，永远
三星半，演员很好，色调很好，取景很好，立面的家具也真的都很好，就是那个心态转折点不太够力，没能打动到我。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
