剧情介绍

  喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
  Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
  Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
  The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
  Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
  Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
  Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
  In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
  On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 库向南 2小时前 :

    《索尔之子》的浅焦用在以60年代青年女性堕胎的题材上,以沉浸的方式,把观众拉锯到极其私密的地步去凝视主人公所经历的对身体、对社会的疑惑与痛楚。子宫之于女性是什么?一个与生俱来的痛楚来源,让你月月感知身体的存在,性的欢愉,身体的异化与异物入侵的恐惧。男性如何能感知这些因身体构造不同所带来的截然不同的最基础的生物有机体的体验?就更别提在这最基础上面所构建的层层,这一切也许都能简化成枷锁两字。而我们都应该反问自己一句,一具生而就能孕育其他生命的身体,为什么是生而带着枷锁的奴隶?为什么会是第二性?

  • 堂飞白 0小时前 :

    7。还是差了口气,无论是题材,还是摄影,都没有新意,唯一让人眼前一亮的是女主的表演。

  • 巫映安 3小时前 :

    正发生的其实是过去的往事,是根据传记体小说改编,发生于上世纪六十年代初的故事。故事发生时间更早,影片却像是罗马尼亚电影《四月三周两天》的法国版本,但故事叙述、场景把控及气氛营造上,导演显然太嫩了,比蒙吉差得太远。导演只能靠暴露及血腥镜头来博出位,很多的裸体镜头其实毫无必要。从影片所叙述来看,女主的遭遇很大部分与其性格相关,她对待生活与处理问题的方式,即使不是因堕胎也会因他事而陷入重重麻烦之中。

  • 战兴业 3小时前 :

    不知道法国人咋想的会选送《钛》冲奥而不是这片,虽然它也就是个低配版的《四月三周两天》,但是结合美国的时下热点怎么也不可能首轮就出局啊。如果退一步 就算把技法先搁在一边不谈,也不是只有四三二的,同题创作早就有过更好的作品了。这片拿金狮完全不够格,奖给太高了。

  • 侍晋鹏 8小时前 :

    这是TA的身体,TA的子宫,任何医生法律都无权这么做!

  • 俟飞兰 9小时前 :

    1960s,2022正发生。电影本身拍得中规中矩,生命毕竟是无辜的,拥有子宫更要保护好自己。p.s.女主的天鹅颈是真漂亮

  • 伟思洁 4小时前 :

    女性才理解女性。医生都是男的大部分不支持堕胎,堕胎医生是女的,纸条女孩不单单是介绍堕胎医生给安妮,还愿意借钱给她。帮安妮介绍医生的男的还想趁机揩油。“孩子”的爹一点用没有,如果堕胎这件事医生和母亲都是犯罪,孩子的爹不得判死刑么?

  • 戏斯乔 6小时前 :

    有些镜头看着还是挺揪心的,能切实的感受到女主的痛,旁人再多也没有一个人可以真正的帮到她。同题材很容易让人想到四月三周两天,正发生的片名我像是在说,尽管时代在不断进步,但这样的故事仍然不断在发生,只是鞭子没有打在自己的身上,不觉得痛罢了。还是希望社会能向绝望的人伸出援助之手吧,救救很多需要帮助的人们。

  • 始醉蝶 6小时前 :

    这两年是要沉浸式所有体验吗,一方面惊悚感和切肤痛都代了,另一方面不知道四周三天和从不有时总是和于佩尔阿姨的孕事之后,停留在最表层的堕胎故事还能带给人什么信息增量,戴套朋友们给我戴套,想去戴环一劳永逸

  • 乙秀敏 0小时前 :

    基本上都是中近景,是为了用画面配合女主在混乱中恐惧茫然的心态吗,视野被高度局限,不知道画框外等待自己的是什么 / “Miss, accept it. You have no choice.” 和善一笑 / 痛感似乎已经成为法国片不可分割的一部分了

  • 单毅然 8小时前 :

    男女之间的不公从只有女性会怀孕开始。生而为女,真的太难。

  • 堵子明 3小时前 :

    其实刚开始看的时候我一直在拿它与432和从不很少有时总是对比,但越看到后面越感觉其实更适合对标的是同年的暗处的女儿。就是直指现在全球生育率这么低的直接原因。为什么女主角拼死都坚决要堕胎,就是因为这是只攻击女人的疾病,把女人变成家庭主妇的凶手。凭什么都是抒发欲望,女性就要承受额外的这种母职惩罚呢?女主掷地有声的一句“之后我或许会要小孩,但不是现在,绝不是以我整个人生作为代价”就是对社会喊出的一声响亮的“不”。(看完打开微博 中国计生协:#今年开展未婚人群人工流产干预专项行动# It's happening.

  • 宋书蝶 3小时前 :

    这是TA的身体,TA的子宫,任何医生法律都无权这么做!

  • 户静柏 4小时前 :

    从女主视角进行的直线叙事,没有枝蔓,男人们站得远远的轻巧推脱,私下交易的非法堕胎手术,直面淋漓的鲜血拍得不留情面。女性导演并不是刻板印象的细腻温柔感性或煽情,女性导演的取材和观察世界的角度,才是她们与男导演的区别。把1960年代的生死无助冷静呈现,才能让今日的人们明白,女性对自己身体的主权,是如何一寸一寸争取回来的。

  • 唐子怡 0小时前 :

    一种女人才会得的人造疾病 每天都上演的body horror半个多世纪后我还能看见每天流向union square的人群 ing ing 他们千方百计地抑制你成长为想要成为的人 期望世界上的每一个anne都能够不疼痛 自由写作

  • 厉宏扬 5小时前 :

    让你怀孕的是一个政治家,他的朋友一个是医生,一个是律师,他们在海滩说说笑笑,当你快要溺死的时候他们劝你莫做蠢事。

  • 丘晨旭 4小时前 :

    一種身體語言的影像,卻又沒有〈鈦〉那麼(表面上)激進。詞語的現在進行時語意,就是『正發生』

  • 俎星海 6小时前 :

    7.6/很多面部特写,这层铺垫以致后面DIY和第一次堕胎两场戏聚焦的面部都让人心里有种生理上的共鸣。在毅然决然下,恍惚中那声“自然流产”让人终于平静。

  • 仇映冬 9小时前 :

    4.5几乎将镜头完全对准了女主角,去放大她的欲望、痛苦和挣扎,60年代法国堕胎入刑的大背景下,女性承受了难以言说的伤害,“一种只攻击女人的病”,在怀孕后,她身边的那些男人一个个展现了极其丑陋的嘴脸,拿掉孩子是她对生命最后的寄望,“也许我之后会要孩子,但现在我只想流掉他”,在第一次流产失败后,再做一次会面临极大的风险,在死亡与自由的抉择中,我们看到了勇敢和坚决,即使死去即使被抓进监狱,电影的故事很简单,但却越来越让人与女主角感同身受,那来自身体与灵魂的煎熬,时至今日仍然有许多人以这样或者那样的理由阻止女性堕胎,电影虽然没有直接批判,但却无时不在呈现这种对女性权利剥夺的罪恶,用纪实和凝视的方式来展现女性为维护自由的无畏与牺牲,在许多类似题材的佳作中,这部电影也做到了让人印象深刻

  • 戚问芙 1小时前 :

    基调比想象中轻盈,故事讲述及镜头语言也更偏向描绘安妮的个人感受,不过这时候在美国上映真是过于应景。给我最大的感慨竟然是她那两个好朋友,发现怀孕之后居然直接形同陌路了上课都不要坐一起,虽然人之常情但直接搞到女主面对有爱的父母及并不糟糕的物质生活却依旧孤立无援,这某种意义上比432还要绝望

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved